W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-grddl-wg@w3.org > September 2007

Re: unaddressed comment?

From: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hpl.hp.com>
Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2007 14:45:48 +0100
Message-ID: <46F2798C.7030501@hpl.hp.com>
To: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
CC: public-grddl-wg@w3.org

Dan Connolly wrote:
> Jeremy Carroll wrote:
>> I don't see a reply to:
>> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-grddl-comments/2007JulSep/0000.html 
> It's a comment on the primer, so it wasn't critical path to REC,
> but yes, it's still outstanding.

Hmmm, I've just looked at every instance of the word HTML or html in the 
primer. I don't think there is much room for real confusion.

All the early uses are followed by examples that have a declaration of 
being XHTML. The later examples all have an xmlns decl for xhtml.

I would encourage an editor to reply to the commentator asking for where 
this potential confusion actually arises.

Received on Thursday, 20 September 2007 13:46:57 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:39:12 UTC