I'm fine with this. (Apologies for not being up-to-speed on the discussions that occurred before I joined the group) Jeremy Dan Connolly wrote: > On Fri, 2007-05-25 at 10:52 +0100, Jeremy Carroll wrote: > [...] >> quoted from David Booth >> >> Does an XML namespace necessarily imply a certain set of semantics? > > On the root element, yes, it does. > > We discussed this as part of > issue-mt-ns: how GRDDL interacts with XML and RDF media type > http://www.w3.org/2004/01/rdxh/spec#issue-mt-ns > > and before closing that issue, we consulted the TAG: > > follow your nose from XML documents to namespace documents? > xmlFunctions-34, nsMediaType-3, RDFinXHTML-35 > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2006Nov/0086.html > > http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/2006/11/14-tagmem-minutes#item03 > > -- Hewlett-Packard Limited registered Office: Cain Road, Bracknell, Berks RG12 1HN Registered No: 690597 EnglandReceived on Tuesday, 29 May 2007 13:35:58 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:11:49 GMT