W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-grddl-wg@w3.org > May 2007

Re: (mis)using XML 'syntactic' namespaces

From: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hpl.hp.com>
Date: Tue, 29 May 2007 14:35:29 +0100
Message-ID: <465C2C21.8080405@hpl.hp.com>
To: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
CC: GRDDL Working Group <public-grddl-wg@w3.org>, "Booth, David (HP Software - Boston)" <dbooth@hp.com>


I'm fine with this.

(Apologies for not being up-to-speed on the discussions that occurred 
before I joined the group)

Jeremy


Dan Connolly wrote:
> On Fri, 2007-05-25 at 10:52 +0100, Jeremy Carroll wrote:
> [...]
>> quoted from David Booth
>>
>> Does an XML namespace necessarily imply a certain set of semantics?
> 
> On the root element, yes, it does.
> 
> We discussed this as part of 
>  issue-mt-ns: how GRDDL interacts with XML and RDF media type
>  http://www.w3.org/2004/01/rdxh/spec#issue-mt-ns
> 
> and before closing that issue, we consulted the TAG:
> 
> follow your nose from XML documents to namespace documents?
> xmlFunctions-34, nsMediaType-3, RDFinXHTML-35
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2006Nov/0086.html
> 
> http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/2006/11/14-tagmem-minutes#item03
> 
> 

-- 
Hewlett-Packard Limited
registered Office: Cain Road, Bracknell, Berks RG12 1HN
Registered No: 690597 England
Received on Tuesday, 29 May 2007 13:35:58 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:11:49 GMT