In the example that you gave, although you said that Ralph had included the address definitions by reference, it seems rather that the address elements were used with reference to the original namespace. A GRDDL transformation applies to a whole document. Wouldn't Ralph's transformation yield the correct result for Ralph's document? Regards, Murray At 10:56 AM 5/25/2007 +0100, Jeremy Carroll wrote: >FWIW: my own view is that: >a) this is a moderately serious problem for GRDDL >b) we can't realistically fix it > >and so I would like to see: >- warning text in the spec, and maybe in the primer >- a new postponed issue, to be passed to the TAG. > >I am interested to hear other people's opinion. > >Jeremy > >-- >Hewlett-Packard Limited >registered Office: Cain Road, Bracknell, Berks RG12 1HN >Registered No: 690597 England >Received on Friday, 25 May 2007 13:41:51 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:11:49 GMT