Fabien Gandon wrote: >> + ACTION: john-l to make sure rdfa1 test case text reflects >> current state of rdfa. > I don't understand this point. What exactly is needed here? > Me neither. The test by its nature will encapsulate some point in the development of RDF-A. The description of test perhaps should make that clear, possibly with a link to where we best feel that up-to-date RDFA code might be (perhaps in the library, perhaps in the Wiki). Jeremy -- Hewlett-Packard Limited registered Office: Cain Road, Bracknell, Berks RG12 1HN Registered No: 690597 EnglandReceived on Wednesday, 16 May 2007 08:17:54 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:11:49 GMT