Fabien Gandon wrote: > As for the url parameter I am inclined to keep it because in a number of > cases the produced RDF/XML is not directly used by the GRDDL agent that > knows the base url but is saved in a file and processed later. In these > cases, having a standalone RDF/XML output that includes the base is very > convenient since no post processing is required at all. Yes that is a use-case, but maybe it should be addressed in a different way ... e.g. read the GRDDL result as an RDF graph, and then reserialize it, using absolute URIs. It isn't a use-case in our use cases document, which is perhaps why we haven't met it the way you envisage. Jeremy -- Hewlett-Packard Limited registered Office: Cain Road, Bracknell, Berks RG12 1HN Registered No: 690597 EnglandReceived on Tuesday, 8 May 2007 20:02:11 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:11:49 GMT