I note that DanC offers: [[ I note that HP is party to the WG decision on issue-faithful-infoset; bwm attended the meeting where it was decided, and jjc confirmed the decision in a recent discussion about advancing to CR. ]] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-grddl-comments/2007AprJun/0045 I'll do my best to discuss David's comments with him off-list, and come back on-list with a clearer summary of his remaining concerns. Possible outcomes include: - David persuades me that he has concerns around which HP has a business interest, and hence I actively support such concerns - I fully address David's concerns (in which case we might send highlights of our discussion to the comments list, to close off the discussion) - David remains with outstanding personal comments that the WG will need to address, about which I would abstain Jeremy -- Hewlett-Packard Limited registered Office: Cain Road, Bracknell, Berks RG12 1HN Registered No: 690597 EnglandReceived on Tuesday, 8 May 2007 13:32:20 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:11:49 GMT