Re: issue-base-param

On Thu, 2007-03-29 at 17:14 -0400, Chimezie Ogbuji wrote:
> On Thu, 29 Mar 2007, Dan Connolly wrote:
[...]
> They are answered by the chain of normative dependencies.
> 
> > The base IRI of E, in this case, is http://www.example.org/ .
> > Or is it... XPath doesn't cite xml base... crud... don't
> > tell me we need a normative dependency on the XQuery data model...
> 
> No need at all (XML dependency chain):
> 
> * http://www.w3.org/TR/xpath
> * http://www.w3.org/TR/xml-infoset
> * http://www.w3.org/TR/xmlbase/

Huh? xpath doesn't cite infoset. Oops... yes, it does,
but only in "B XML Information Set Mapping (Non-Normative)".

> > I added a todo... the rule box to think about this.
> > http://www.w3.org/2004/01/rdxh/spec
> > Revision 1.241  2007/03/29 19:51:01  connolly
> > considering citing Infoset spec re xml:base
> 
> You don't need to, we already have a normative dependency on XPath 1.0

I'm not sure that's enough. I'm standing by for further advice.

> > I mostly think this is editorial, i.e. it doesn't merit re-opening
> > issue-base-param. Harry, you might want to give that a think.
> 
> It certainly does not merit re-opening the issue, IMHO.


-- 
Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541  0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E