- From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 09 Mar 2007 13:04:51 -0600
- To: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hpl.hp.com>
- Cc: GRDDL Working Group <public-grddl-wg@w3.org>
On Fri, 2007-03-09 at 10:39 +0000, Jeremy Carroll wrote: [...] > - I think I would advocate taking the GRDDL spec to CR along with test > to LC. This is then a "call-for-implementations" > > - PR is then late May / mid June > > This timescale strikes me as ambitious, (too ambitious?), and puts quite > a lot of pressure on the editors of both Test and Primer. Personally, I > would advise them to think hard about whether they have the time and > effort, and if not, the group should reconsider whether we need to Rec > Track these documents. Also keep in mind the question of W3C staff support. Our charter set an expectation of going straight to PR without a hold-still-for-implementations CR phase, and it didn't anticipate me taking on the HTML WG co-chair role. I started looking for an alternate team contact a few weeks ago, but I'm not making much progress; there isn't much spare bandwidth in the staff. I lean toward going to PR by WWW2007 with whatever we have in hand. For details, again, see http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/grddl-wg/sched7 <- http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/grddl-wg/#sched > Clearly, we will have a better set of > deliverables if we do, and as long as their is sufficient commitment > from the editors to do the necessary work, then I am supportive. > > Jeremy -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/ D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541 0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E
Received on Friday, 9 March 2007 19:05:02 UTC