- From: Harry Halpin <hhalpin@ibiblio.org>
- Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2007 22:01:19 -0500
- To: Murray Maloney <murray@muzmo.com>
- Cc: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>, GRDDL Working Group <public-grddl-wg@w3.org>
This is beyond my ken - I always think in terms of "URIs should mean IRIs anyways", de facto if not de jure. So, DanC - any advice? I'll give it a thorough read tomorrow before shipping off... Murray Maloney wrote: > > BTW, > > I have not made the s/URI/IRI/ change. > > I actually think that it is not as straightforward a change as we > thought. > > I discovered that the first few mentions of URI had no links > to the references section and I am not familiar with the protocol. > I also noticed that one of the earliest mentions of a URI is in > a normative statement in section 3 and that is to a namespace-uri, > which I think is a term that cannot readily changed to namespace-iri > unless I am mistaken. > > Please advise. > > Murray > > -- -harry Harry Halpin, University of Edinburgh http://www.ibiblio.org/hhalpin 6B522426
Received on Thursday, 1 March 2007 03:01:39 UTC