W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-grddl-wg@w3.org > June 2007

Re: GRDDL test results from TopBraid Composer, please?

From: Holger Knublauch <holger@topquadrant.com>
Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2007 11:32:09 -0700
Message-ID: <4682AD29.2080703@topquadrant.com>
To: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
CC: public-grddl-wg <public-grddl-wg@w3.org>

Hi Dan,

thanks for mentioning us.

Yes we do have a home-made GRDDL importer for TopBraid, but we plan to 
replace it with the Jena implementation as soon as it becomes 
sufficiently stable.  We therefore also did not run systematic test 
cases on our own implementation.

Not sure what this means for your lists, but at least we will remain a 
front-end, development tool and data integration platform for GRDDL.

Cheers,
Holger


Dan Connolly wrote:
> Holger, we're collecting test results for GRDDL
> implementations; it would be nice to add a column
> for TopBraid Composer. Could you try the test suite
> and send us some results in EARL/RDF, please?
> http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/grddl-wg/td/test_results
> 
> See also GRDDL progress
> http://dannyayers.com/2007/06/25/grddl-progress
> 
> I just added Composer to the list of GRDDL implementations
>   http://esw.w3.org/topic/GrddlImplementations
> based on http://www.topbraidcomposer.com/features.html 
> especially the section
>   Semantic Web and Mash-Up development with RDFa and GRDDL
> 
> I'm reminded by the Jazoon talk, via Henry Story (and
> planetrdf and bloglines...)
> http://blogs.sun.com/bblfish/entry/jazoon
> http://jazoon.com/en/conference/presentationdetails.html?type=sid&detail=870
>  (which I just added to http://del.icio.us/connolly/grddl )
> 
> 
> I'm not sure why I didn't add TopBraid to the list earlier;
> I see you announced GRDDL support back in November.
> http://composing-the-semantic-web.blogspot.com/2006/11/grddl-support-in-topbraid-composer.html
> 
Received on Wednesday, 27 June 2007 18:32:25 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:11:50 GMT