RE: #faithful-infoset wordsmithing

On Wed, 2007-06-20 at 14:03 -0400, Booth, David (HP Software - Boston)
wrote:
> >  -- http://www.w3.org/2004/01/rdxh/spec 1.272

> Please *do* mention TAG issue xmlFunctions-34 in the body, because that
> makes it much clearer to the reader what questions we are hoping the
> resolution of that TAG issue will provide "clarification and guidance"
> about.  I think it is far more important to be clear than to avoid
> mentioning it just for the sake of not looking odd.

I thought about this some more, and I still think that what the WG
hopes belongs in the status section, not the body of the spec.

I think the test cases make this more clear than any text in
the prose of the spec could do.
 
-- 
Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/

Received on Monday, 25 June 2007 22:58:06 UTC