Re: misc editorial questions/issues on spec (#issue-output-formats)

On Thu, 2007-06-21 at 10:53 -0400, Booth, David (HP Software - Boston)
wrote:
> Below are the additional editorial questions/issues that I noticed and
> promised to send.
> 
> ------------
> 
> Q1a: Missing MUST, SHOULD or MAY for RDF/XML output format.
> The spec does not make clear whether transformation results MUST, SHOULD
> or MAY be obtainable in RDF/XML

That's an aspect of the design that was decided by the WG, not
delegated to the editor. The WG decided #issue-whichlangs on 6 Dec,
and then on 25 April decided that the then-current text
address all outstanding issues, including that one.

http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/grddl-wg/issues#issue-output-formats
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-grddl-wg/2007Apr/att-0212/2007_04_25-grddl-minutes.html#item05

So this isn't something I (as editor) can do without the WG
reconsidering the issue.

More on the other questions separately.

-- 
Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/