Regarding my action: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-grddl-wg/2007Jun/att-0243/GRD DL-WG_--_20_Jun_2007.html#item07 [[ ACTION: dbooth Send "just that sentence to be added to faithful infoset" over the listserv ]] That action is now moot and can be dropped. The additional sentence for the Faithful Renditions section (not "faithful infoset") was to facilitate a future definition of "complete GRDDL results", but I think it would take the WG too much time to consider it, and I would rather the WG focus on the more critical part of the ambiguity issue. I intend to pursue the notion of "complete GRDDL results" as a member submission instead. Thanks David Booth, Ph.D. HP Software +1 617 629 8881 office | dbooth@hp.com http://www.hp.com/go/software Opinions expressed herein are those of the author and do not represent the official views of HP unless explicitly stated otherwise.Received on Thursday, 21 June 2007 19:15:04 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:11:50 GMT