- From: Dave Beckett <dave@dajobe.org>
- Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2007 00:58:35 -0700
- To: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hpl.hp.com>
- CC: "Clark, John" <CLARKJ2@ccf.org>, public-grddl-wg@w3.org
Jeremy Carroll wrote: > > PS: We agreed yesterday to add a few more GRDDL library tests to the > test editor's draft. (These haven't yet been approved). It may be better > use of your time to hold off for a day or two until this is done. > > Since your feedback has resulted in changes to the GRDDL library code, I > would very much appreciate test reports from Raptor for the modified > library code. We would like the library transforms to work with libxslt. Well, I already ran the tests yesterday against raptor SVN r12366 with libxml 2.6.29 and libxslt 1.1.21 and got pretty much the same results. Failures: 1) inline-rdf4 The http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/grddl-wg/td/grddl-tests#inline-rdf4 (was embedded-rdf4) fails due to the test suite requiring a fix to rdflib that is not in a released version. 2) error1 This is a new test since I last ran the tests http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/grddl-wg/td/grddl-tests#error1 which I also fail but I noticed it is informative. Tests that check error handling seems to be a problem as I do not see it efined in the GRDDL spec; what happens when an error occurs in URI retrieval, XSLT, XInclude, RDF/XML parsing or some other step. Maybe you can remove or separate out informative tests from the full list? Failure is an option. I'll wait for a response before testing again and sending in an EARL file. I may hand-edit inline-rdf4 to mark as pass... Dave
Received on Thursday, 21 June 2007 07:59:04 UTC