review test doc appendix A

This looks great.

One minor points:
    - do we want to %s/embedded/inline/g in this doc, I am happy with 
not, but if the editor felt moved to do this change, it would be an 
improvement.

General comment about quality of this review ...
+  I haven't checked every item in detail.
+  It is clear that a largish sample of the information is correct (i.e. 
I have found any errors)
+  It is certainly large enough that we meet our charter objective of 
testing every feature (whatever that means)
+  I haven't even begun thinking about omissions from the list, I don't 
think that is at all necessary.

A user who reads the spec and wants to see an example of what a 
particular rule means will find this appendix helpful.

Jeremy



-- 
Hewlett-Packard Limited
registered Office: Cain Road, Bracknell, Berks RG12 1HN
Registered No: 690597 England

Received on Wednesday, 20 June 2007 14:27:22 UTC