- From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2007 16:33:36 -0500
- To: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hpl.hp.com>
- Cc: GRDDL Working Group <public-grddl-wg@w3.org>
On Tue, 2007-06-19 at 14:52 +0100, Jeremy Carroll wrote: > 1) modules [...] > Is this sufficient? As far as I know, yes. > 2) avoiding repetition, continuations? > [...] I'm trying to grok the continuation code... failing. Please add the Michael Kay reference in a comment. > Is there a more straight forward way, in XSLT 1.0, of only writing the > relative URI logic once? Not that I know of. XSLT 1.0 feels like COBOL sometimes. I dunno which is worse... a "please excuse the copy-and-paste programming" comment or a "please excuse the continuations contortions" comment. Since I gather the continuation stuff is working, I can live with the latter. -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
Received on Tuesday, 19 June 2007 21:33:43 UTC