> From: Harry Halpin [mailto:hhalpin@ibiblio.org] > > If you wish for the WG to seriously consider your change, > we need a > finite list of all changes that need to be made to the spec, including > non-normative text. If you can provide such a list for the WG > and editor > in particular, it will help consideration of your change. However, at > this point in W3C Process we cannot afford to make commitments to > "open-ended" changes to the spec. I agree that would be best, but unfortunately I do not have time to do that before tomorrow's meeting. > > Also, we cannot of course add in a mention of a potential note > unless the text of the Note is actually written. Sure we can. Here is how it was done in the RDF Concepts document, when they were anticipating the IRI spec: http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-concepts/#section-Graph-URIref [[ Note: this section anticipates an RFC on Internationalized Resource Identifiers. Implementations may issue warnings concerning the use of RDF URI References that do not conform with [IRI draft] or its successors. ]] I'll change the suggested mention to be more similar to that. > > I would suggest doing these before suggesting any other > changes, as > suggesting too many changes in an "open-ended" manner makes it > impossible for the WG to consider them. As you know due to your > experience in these matters, it is far better to have one solid > proposal, with test-cases and a list of textual changes, than many. I appreciate the suggestion, but in light of the recent discussion, I think I should at least offer an alternate proposal that would address the variability in *both* the "transformation determination" and "transformation application" steps. I'm not sure I'll have time to work it up, but I'll try. Thanks David Booth, Ph.D. HP Software +1 617 629 8881 office | dbooth@hp.com http://www.hp.com/go/software Opinions expressed herein are those of the author and do not represent the official views of HP unless explicitly stated otherwise.Received on Tuesday, 19 June 2007 21:04:27 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:11:50 GMT