Re: review of namespace doc

On Tue, 2007-06-19 at 12:04 +0100, Jeremy Carroll wrote:
> This all looks OK...

Oops; when thinking thru David's proposal to make
transformation properties take documents rather
than XPath Nodesets, I realized this bit of
the namespace document is bogus:

    dataview:TransformationProperty     a :Class;
         :comment """a FunctionalProperty that relates
    XML document root nodes to
    RDF graphs""";
         :domain dataview:RootNode;
         :label "TransformationProperty";
         :range dataview:RDFGraph;
         :subClassOf owl:FunctionalProperty .

It's not the class that has that domain, but every
member of the class.

I think that can be said with OWL-Full restrictions
on domain/range; I'm not sure whether it's worthwhile.
Hmm....

For now, I'm adding a TODO to 1.265 of
http://www.w3.org/2004/01/rdxh/spec#grddlvocab


-- 
Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/