W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-grddl-wg@w3.org > June 2007

Re: review of namespace doc

From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2007 10:44:58 -0500
To: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hpl.hp.com>
Cc: GRDDL Working Group <public-grddl-wg@w3.org>, Dave Beckett <dave@dajobe.org>
Message-Id: <1182267898.6367.152.camel@pav>

On Tue, 2007-06-19 at 12:04 +0100, Jeremy Carroll wrote:
> This all looks OK...

Oops; when thinking thru David's proposal to make
transformation properties take documents rather
than XPath Nodesets, I realized this bit of
the namespace document is bogus:

    dataview:TransformationProperty     a :Class;
         :comment """a FunctionalProperty that relates
    XML document root nodes to
    RDF graphs""";
         :domain dataview:RootNode;
         :label "TransformationProperty";
         :range dataview:RDFGraph;
         :subClassOf owl:FunctionalProperty .

It's not the class that has that domain, but every
member of the class.

I think that can be said with OWL-Full restrictions
on domain/range; I'm not sure whether it's worthwhile.
Hmm....

For now, I'm adding a TODO to 1.265 of
http://www.w3.org/2004/01/rdxh/spec#grddlvocab


-- 
Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
Received on Tuesday, 19 June 2007 15:45:11 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:11:50 GMT