- From: Booth, David (HP Software - Boston) <dbooth@hp.com>
- Date: Sun, 17 Jun 2007 11:18:22 -0400
- To: "Murray Maloney" <murray@muzmo.com>
- Cc: "GRDDL Working Group" <public-grddl-wg@w3.org>
> From: public-grddl-wg-request@w3.org > [mailto:public-grddl-wg-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Murray Maloney > [ . . . ] > As to licence to use xi:include, any XML processor that supports > the XInclude specification is free to exercise the specification. > No further licence is required or sought. If you have any > real interest > in the content of a document, then you are also interested in any > transclusions that it may contain, and so on, as long as you can > follow your nose. That's the web. Are you suggesting that the GRDDL WG *should* make a decision on the question of whether XInclude expansion is licensed? > If your application or agent chooses to inhibit XInclude > processing, use it > to meet your needs. You may get fewer triples than me, but you will > feel confident knowing that you didn't need the extraneous > information. Point of clarification: it is not just a matter of producing fewer triples, it is also a matter of producing *different* triples -- different assertions. David Booth, Ph.D. HP Software +1 617 629 8881 office | dbooth@hp.com http://www.hp.com/go/software Opinions expressed herein are those of the author and do not represent the official views of HP unless explicitly stated otherwise.
Received on Sunday, 17 June 2007 15:22:43 UTC