- From: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hpl.hp.com>
- Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2007 14:20:06 +0100
- To: ogbujic@ccf.org
- CC: "Clark, John" <CLARKJ2@ccf.org>, GRDDL Working Group <public-grddl-wg@w3.org>
Chimezie Ogbuji wrote: > I've moved this thread to public-grddl-wg as it is more appropriate for > your question. > > On Wed, 2007-06-13 at 08:57 -0400, Clark, John wrote: > >> I guess I didn't notice this because I've been generating a "fresh" >> `grddl-tests.rdf` from `grddl-tests.html` using `aboutTests.xsl`. Why >> do we keep `grddl-tests.rdf` under version control? > > Mostly for convenience and posterity (most other RDF-based test > frameworks keep a test manifest in version control: SPARQL, RDF tests, > etc.). It would seem unnecessarily recursive to require a GRDDL > aware-agent running the tests to determine compliance to have to compute > the test harness in the first place. > +1 I started off my development from the .rdf version, and once I got more confident, migrated to using the GRDDL result of the .html doc. Jeremy -- Hewlett-Packard Limited registered Office: Cain Road, Bracknell, Berks RG12 1HN Registered No: 690597 England
Received on Wednesday, 13 June 2007 13:20:23 UTC