W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-grddl-wg@w3.org > June 2007

Re: How are correct, unambiguous results possible with implementation-defined XML pre-processing? (#faithful-infoset)

From: Booth, David (HP Software - Boston) <dbooth@hp.com>
Date: Wed, 6 Jun 2007 11:11:13 -0400
Message-ID: <EBBD956B8A9002479B0C9CE9FE14A6C202BD351D@tayexc19.americas.cpqcorp.net>
To: <public-grddl-wg@w3.org>
Cc: <danc@w3.org>

On Tuesday, 5 June 2007 20:12:37 GMT Dan Connelly wrote:
>
> On Thu, 2007-05-24 at 11:34 +0100, Jeremy Carroll wrote:
> >
> > My own view is that the GRDDL spec is not clear enough about
> > faithful infoset not being wholly adequately resolved, but
> > the resolution being a pragmatic decision based on what we
> > felt we could realistically do.
> >
> > I suggest we reopen it and postpone - perhaps with the same
> > resolution, but restricted to this version of GRDDL, noting
> > that it is an area where future work may be needed. In doing
> > that we can also draw the postponed issue to the attention of
> > the XProc WG, and formally give them the option of
> > (partially) addressing it.
>
> I think that's a good idea.

I would view that as sweeping the issue under the carpet, where the
carpet happens to be labeled "postponed issues".

David Booth, Ph.D.
HP Software
+1 617 629 8881 office  |  dbooth@hp.com
http://www.hp.com/go/software
Received on Wednesday, 6 June 2007 15:12:28 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:11:49 GMT