- From: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hpl.hp.com>
- Date: Mon, 04 Jun 2007 19:41:14 +0100
- To: Simone Onofri <simone.onofri@gmail.com>
- CC: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>, GRDDL Working Group <public-grddl-wg@w3.org>
Simone Onofri wrote: > > Jeremy please add the logo question (any favourites or editings?) and > terms for collaboration with SWEO. I'll send in few hours another > logo-set. what's a recent message concerning SWEO that we should consider? Jeremy > > Thanks and apologies for regrets... next week I'll be on telecon. > > All the best, > > Simone > > On 6/4/07, Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hpl.hp.com> wrote: >> >> >> >> Hi Dan >> >> Given the regrets we've already had (Simone, Danny and Harry) I guess >> we're unlikely to make progress on issues like the primer etc. So a >> sketch agenda that I could formalise in the weekly-agenda page looks >> something like: >> >> 1 Admin >> >> >> 2 Action update: >> (any action items that don't come under any other item) >> This agendum is intended simply to record progress (or lack of >> progress) on action items. >> >> 3 Test Cases >> Chime's agenda request >> >> 4 Booth comment: editorial >> >> 5 Booth comment: baseURI >> >> 6 Booth comment: ambiguity >> >> 7 Booth comment: message pipeline >> >> with the main goal being to clear the comments list, at least for now. >> Does that look OK? >> >> Jeremy >> -- >> Hewlett-Packard Limited >> registered Office: Cain Road, Bracknell, Berks RG12 1HN >> Registered No: 690597 England >> >> >> > -- Hewlett-Packard Limited registered Office: Cain Road, Bracknell, Berks RG12 1HN Registered No: 690597 England
Received on Monday, 4 June 2007 18:41:49 UTC