- From: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hpl.hp.com>
- Date: Mon, 04 Jun 2007 18:51:35 +0100
- To: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- CC: GRDDL Working Group <public-grddl-wg@w3.org>
Hi Dan
Given the regrets we've already had (Simone, Danny and Harry) I guess
we're unlikely to make progress on issues like the primer etc. So a
sketch agenda that I could formalise in the weekly-agenda page looks
something like:
1 Admin
2 Action update:
(any action items that don't come under any other item)
This agendum is intended simply to record progress (or lack of
progress) on action items.
3 Test Cases
Chime's agenda request
4 Booth comment: editorial
5 Booth comment: baseURI
6 Booth comment: ambiguity
7 Booth comment: message pipeline
with the main goal being to clear the comments list, at least for now.
Does that look OK?
Jeremy
--
Hewlett-Packard Limited
registered Office: Cain Road, Bracknell, Berks RG12 1HN
Registered No: 690597 England
Received on Monday, 4 June 2007 17:51:57 UTC