"Using GRDDL with XML Namespace Documents" could be more helpful..?

Nothing critical, but (unless I've missed something) I don't think
it's clear enough that a namespace doc can be GRDDL-enabled HTML.

I've been discussing GRDDL-enabling an XML format
(http://www.metalinker.org/) and said "you'll just need a little tweak
to the namespace doc" (which is currently HTML). Naturally the reply
asked what the tweak would be.

Referring to the spec I was expecting just to have to copy & paste a
snippet of HTML to demonstrate. But in the spec the namespace doc
example only appears to have an RDF/XML representation:
http://www.w3.org/2004/01/rdxh/p3q-ns-example

The nearest suggestion I can find is:
[[
For example, a namespace document may have an XML Schema
representation or an RDF Schema representation, or perhaps both, using
content negotiation.

To associate a GRDDL transformation with a whole dialect, include a
grddl:namespaceTransformation property in a GRDDL result of the
namespace document.
]]
http://www.w3.org/TR/grddl/#ns-bind

It's not obvious from the Primer either, that just points back to this
section of the spec.

It would maybe have been better to include a GRDDL-enabled HTML
version of the p3q namespace doc in the spec, or a similar example in
the Primer.

Cheers,
Danny.


-- 

http://dannyayers.com

Received on Friday, 20 July 2007 09:59:19 UTC