W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-grddl-wg@w3.org > January 2007

TAG work related to Faithful Infoset

From: Murray Maloney <murray@muzmo.com>
Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2007 15:32:47 -0500
Message-Id: <>
To: public-grddl-wg@w3.org

I thought that this might be of interest with respect to the Faithful 
Infoset issue.

No, I have not written that paragraph yet. I am sorry, but I have been 
to two elderly parents whose health is failing. I'll try to get to this soon.

>To: public-xml-processing-model-wg <public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org>
>From: ht@inf.ed.ac.uk (Henry S. Thompson)
>Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2007 18:51:49 +0000
>Subject: Heads up wrt our _other_ deliverable
>Hash: SHA1
>The TAG has been talking on and off for a long time about XML
>Functions and the "default processing model".  I took an action to
>write up our preliminary conclusions [1] at the last TAG f2f, and the
>result is now publicly visible:
>   http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/doc/elabInfoset.html
>Since the TAG doesn't 'do' RECs as such, if the TAG decides it likes
>this one thing that _might_ happen is that it would just get dumped in
>our laps, so, I thought I should give the WG advanced warning.
>The thread to pick up in order to comment where the TAG will notice is
>on the public TAG mailing list (mailto:www-tag@w3.org) archive [1].
>[1] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/2006/12/11-minutes#item07
>[1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2007Jan/0061.html
>- --
>  Henry S. Thompson, HCRC Language Technology Group, University of Edinburgh
>                      Half-time member of W3C Team
>     2 Buccleuch Place, Edinburgh EH8 9LW, SCOTLAND -- (44) 131 650-4440
>             Fax: (44) 131 650-4587, e-mail: ht@inf.ed.ac.uk
>                    URL: http://www.ltg.ed.ac.uk/~ht/
>[mail really from me _always_ has this .sig -- mail without it is forged spam]
>Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (GNU/Linux)
Received on Tuesday, 30 January 2007 20:50:38 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:39:09 UTC