RE: Rules bug? (applying the right transformation to the right representation)

On Thu, 2006-11-16 at 08:26 -0600, Dan Connolly wrote:
> On Thu, 2006-11-16 at 10:22 +0000, McBride, Brian wrote:
[...]
> > Did you spot that I applied the transform referenced in the xhtml to the
> > svg document?
> 
> No, I was reading too fast. (I hesitated to give an opinion at
> all without working thru the details in a test case... oh well.)
> 
> Hmm... I could perhaps change the rules so that grddl:trasformation
> works more like grddl:txlink;

I just now got around to that in Revision 1.188  2007/01/24 15:25:46
  http://www.w3.org/2004/01/rdxh/spec

>  I wonder if anybody in the
> community is relying on the domain of grddl:transformation
> being an information resource rather than a representation...

I assume not. I suppose we'll find out when we do our next WD.

> I definitely need do do some testing.

I did some positive testing at the N3 level, but I haven't
done any negative tests. Brian, I'd appreciate it if you'd
do a full-blown test for this xhtml/svg case... though our
test harness currently doesn't support multiple representations
of the source document.

I added this test case sketch to the list of pending tests.
  http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/grddl-wg/td/testlist1
  $Revision: 1.32 $ of $Date: 2007/01/24 15:40:29 $

-- 
Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541  0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E