Harry Halpin a écrit : > If you are with the RDFa task force, note that it is part of our > charter to be compatible with RDFa. I would even be happy to include > the an RDFa transformation in the primer (i.e. turn Jane's schedule > into RDFa instead of RDF/XML as current). > However, it would be nice if there was a RDFa->RDF/XML GRDDL > transformation and it would be even better if BenA could finish his > hGRDDL work to make it into a full GRDDL client. The second part of this session will be dedicated to GRDDL-RDFa status, and will mention your points. > Lastly, has the RDFa syntax stabilized? This is the subject of the current session and the discussion his very active between Tim BL, Ivan H, Ralph S and Ben A. -- Fabien - http://www-sop.inria.fr/acacia/fabien/Received on Tuesday, 23 January 2007 19:29:08 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:11:47 GMT