Re: [#issue-base-param] BWM's test case checked in fo

Thanks! It's fixed.

I also guess we should rescind the XInclude test-case [1,2] I made
earlier, because of our resolution from the last meeting [3].

Any objections? The only other option would be to redo the test-suite so
multiple correct outputs are allowed.

[1] http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/grddl-wg/td/xinclude1.html
[2] http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/grddl-wg/td/xinclude1.rdf
[3]http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-grddl-wg/2006Dec/att-0072/GRDDL_Weekly_--_20_Dec_2006.html

Dan Connolly wrote:
> On Mon, 2007-01-08 at 23:26 -0500, Harry Halpin wrote:
>   
>> As per the last meeting, I checked in bwm's test suite[1], although the
>> permissions of the output/input documents in this case need to be fixed
>> (DanC?)
>>     
>
> If you go to...
>   http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/grddl-wg/td/baseURI.html,access
> you'll see:
>   user hhalpin has chacl,racl access
>
> Then you hit the 'world' button.
>
>   
>> [1] http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/grddl-wg/td/testlist1.html#base-param
>>
>>     


-- 
		-harry

Harry Halpin,  University of Edinburgh 
http://www.ibiblio.org/hhalpin 6B522426

Received on Tuesday, 9 January 2007 15:07:30 UTC