W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-grddl-wg@w3.org > April 2007

Re: #xmlbase [1234]

From: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hpl.hp.com>
Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 22:30:59 +0100
Message-ID: <46311A13.8020504@hpl.hp.com>
To: ogbujic@ccf.org
CC: "Clark, John" <CLARKJ2@ccf.org>, GRDDL Working Group <public-grddl-wg@w3.org>

Chimezie Ogbuji wrote:
> The dialog on this is become rather philosophical, which leads me to
> conclude that there needs to be better guidance than just saying "check
> out this RFC specification and this XML base specification; all your
> answers are there".

which is part of the role of the test!

On the sub-issue of xml:base's inside the document (not on the root), I 
have code in the library that deals with this on my old assumption. If 
we change the assumption, I will change the library code, to deal with 
the new case.

I can then take an action to do the following refactoring to the library:
- extract xml:base code from embeddedRDF and put it in its own document, 
referenced via an xsl:import or xsl:include
- add the new document as a third part of the library, intended for 
transform developers

I tend to agree with Chime that we are more likely to get faithful 
renditions, with his version of the test.
Otherwise we are expecting transform authors to know the base issues and 
to implement such code.


Hewlett-Packard Limited
registered Office: Cain Road, Bracknell, Berks RG12 1HN
Registered No: 690597 England
Received on Thursday, 26 April 2007 21:31:41 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:39:11 UTC