W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-grddl-wg@w3.org > April 2007

RE: loopx tests (discussion)

From: Chimezie Ogbuji <ogbujic@ccf.org>
Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 15:04:09 -0400
To: "Clark, John" <CLARKJ2@ccf.org>
cc: "GRDDL Working Group" <public-grddl-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <1177527849.17530.100.camel@otherland>

So, RESOLVED: #loopx,#loopx1,#loopx2,#loopx3 are approved.

On Wed, 2007-04-25 at 14:49 -0400, Clark, John wrote:
> I second this proposal.  (Was this how you anticipated our mini-process
> working, Jeremy?)
> 
> Take care,
> 
>     John L. Clark
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: public-grddl-wg-request@w3.org 
> > [mailto:public-grddl-wg-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Jeremy Carroll
> > Sent: Wednesday, April 25, 2007 2:43 PM
> > To: Ogbuji, Chimezie
> > Cc: GRDDL Working Group
> > Subject: Re: loopx tests (discussion)
> > 
> > 
> > Then, I propose approving these four tests.
> > 
> > Jeremy
> > 
> > 
> > Chimezie Ogbuji wrote:
> > > On Wed, 2007-04-25 at 18:31 +0100, Jeremy Carroll wrote:
> > >>
> > >> Jeremy Carroll wrote:
> > >>>> #loopx
> > >>>    one pass, one n/a
> > >>>> #loopx1
> > >>>    one pass, one n/a
> > >>>> #loopx2
> > >>>    one fail (should be n/a), one pass
> > >>>> #loopx3
> > >>>    one fail (should be n/a), one n/a.
> > >>>
> > >> I think that is enough evidence. The tests are alternatives, with
> > >> #loopx3 being the 'true' but too difficult compute answer.
> > >>
> > >> The GRDDL.py results should be n/a because it passes the first two.
> > >>
> > >> Any thoughts?
> > > 
> > > Yes, GRDDL.py's EARL output *should* be N/A's for those but 
> > isn't now 
> > > primarily because aboutTest.xsl doesn't compute an indication that 
> > > non-maximal results (for tests with multiple output) are 
> > 'alternatives'
> > > to each other.  Also testft.py is currently driven 
> > primarily by these 
> > > indications.  But yes, the language of the text in these tests 
> > > suggests
> > > (strongly) that this is 'passed' by at least two implementations:
> > > 
> > > [[[
> > > ..In particular, this interpretation and the text in the 
> > section that 
> > > follows (8. Security considerations) permits an 
> > implementation to only 
> > > pass the first test due to security restrictions against computing 
> > > recursive GRDDL results.
> > > ]]]
> > > 
> > > 
> > 
> > --
> > Hewlett-Packard Limited
> > registered Office: Cain Road, Bracknell, Berks RG12 1HN 
> > Registered No: 690597 England
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Cleveland Clinic is ranked one of the top 3 hospitals in
> America by U.S.News & World Report. Visit us online at
> http://www.clevelandclinic.org for a complete listing of
> our services, staff and locations.
> 
> 
> Confidentiality Note:  This message is intended for use
> only by the individual or entity to which it is addressed
> and may contain information that is privileged,
> confidential, and exempt from disclosure under applicable
> law.  If the reader of this message is not the intended
> recipient or the employee or agent responsible for
> delivering the message to the intended recipient, you are
> hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or
> copying of this communication is strictly prohibited.  If
> you have received this communication in error,  please
> contact the sender immediately and destroy the material in
> its entirety, whether electronic or hard copy.  Thank you.
> 
> 
> ===================================
> 
> 
-- 
Chimezie Ogbuji
Lead Systems Analyst
Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery
Cleveland Clinic Foundation
9500 Euclid Avenue/ W26
Cleveland, Ohio 44195
Office: (216)444-8593
ogbujic@ccf.org






Cleveland Clinic is ranked one of the top 3 hospitals in
America by U.S.News & World Report. Visit us online at
http://www.clevelandclinic.org for a complete listing of
our services, staff and locations.


Confidentiality Note:  This message is intended for use
only by the individual or entity to which it is addressed
and may contain information that is privileged,
confidential, and exempt from disclosure under applicable
law.  If the reader of this message is not the intended
recipient or the employee or agent responsible for
delivering the message to the intended recipient, you are
hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or
copying of this communication is strictly prohibited.  If
you have received this communication in error,  please
contact the sender immediately and destroy the material in
its entirety, whether electronic or hard copy.  Thank you.


===================================
Received on Wednesday, 25 April 2007 19:04:21 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:11:49 GMT