W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-grddl-wg@w3.org > April 2007

RE: Valid XHTML and Faithful Infoset redflag - stated (semi) formally

From: Clark, John <CLARKJ2@ccf.org>
Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 10:54:32 -0400
Message-ID: <F122C25B4CD6F34BB119A97593679601027CA868@CCHSCLEXMB59.cc.ad.cchs.net>
To: "GRDDL Working Group" <public-grddl-wg@w3.org>

This is an interesting approach.

> Is it the case that xhtml:NotValid is owl:disjointWith 
> grddl:SourceDocument?
> 
> I.e., should the definition of grddl:SourceDocument be:
> 
> Class grddl:SourceDocument
> EquivalentClass: ( grddl:result some grddl:RDFGraph )
> DisjointWith: xhtml:NotValid

You mean xhtml:NotValidDocument here, yes?  Also, should we restrict
grddl:SourceDocument to something narrower such as
grddl:XHTMLSourceDocument, so that we don't inadvertentely exclude
documents from processing under the general XML rules?

What is the universe of discourse in which xhtml:NotValidDocument is the
complement of xhtml:ValidDocument?  If it is "all documents", then
xhtml:NotValidDocument is too broad, as it encompasses documents like
<foo/>.  If it is "all XHTML documents" then this (re-)raises the
question of "what is an XHTML document?"  

If an XHTML document (whatever that may be) is a member of
xhtml:NotValid, can it still take advantage of the GRDDL processing
rules for generic XML documents?  I would say "absolutely".
Furthermore, as I stated before, I think such "invalid" XHTML documents
should be able to take advantage of the XHTML rules as well.

Take care,

    John L. Clark





Cleveland Clinic is ranked one of the top 3 hospitals in
America by U.S.News & World Report. Visit us online at
http://www.clevelandclinic.org for a complete listing of
our services, staff and locations.


Confidentiality Note:  This message is intended for use
only by the individual or entity to which it is addressed
and may contain information that is privileged,
confidential, and exempt from disclosure under applicable
law.  If the reader of this message is not the intended
recipient or the employee or agent responsible for
delivering the message to the intended recipient, you are
hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or
copying of this communication is strictly prohibited.  If
you have received this communication in error,  please
contact the sender immediately and destroy the material in
its entirety, whether electronic or hard copy.  Thank you.


===================================
Received on Wednesday, 25 April 2007 14:54:02 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:11:49 GMT