W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-grddl-wg@w3.org > April 2007

CR Request Updated

From: Harry Halpin <hhalpin@ibiblio.org>
Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2007 20:58:25 -0400
Message-ID: <462EA7B1.8060103@ibiblio.org>
To: public-grddl-wg <public-grddl-wg@w3.org>

I'm still unsure about exact dates, and am not sure what to do about
Stefano and Beckett's comments.
But this is pretty good-to-go I think, but would appreciate another set
of eyes looking over it.

HTML:http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/grddl-wg/crrequest.html

    Transition Request to advance GRDDL to Candidate Recommendation

   This is a [2]transition request to Candidate Recommendation for

      [2] http://www.w3.org/2005/08/transition?docstatus=cr-tr

   Gleaning Resource Descriptions from Dialects of Languages (GRDDL)

   available at:
   @@FILL IN URI OF LATEST GRDDL REVISION WITH THREE OUTSTANDING
   EDITORIAL COMMENTS CORRECTED

   The URI cited above is for the most recent editor's version of the
   specification as of @@FINAL DATE.

   That file is set up to be published by moving it to:
   [3]http://www.w3.org/TR/grddl/

      [3] http://www.w3.org/TR/grddl/

   [4]Gleaning Resource Descriptions from Dialects of Languages (GRDDL)
   had been published on 2 March 2007 at
   [5]http://www.w3.org/TR/2007/WD-grddl-20070302 as a Last Call
   Specification.

      [4] http://www.w3.org/TR/grddl/
      [5] http://www.w3.org/TR/2007/WD-grddl-20070302/

   This document going to CR is in partial requirement of our
   [6]charter, that states that the WG should produce: "a GRDDL
   specification with all issues addressed.".

      [6] http://www.w3.org/2006/07/grddl-charter.html

   Last Call Comments have been addressed over our public listserv, and
   can be seen at:
   [7]http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-grddl-comments. We
   have received no formal objections.

      [7] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-grddl-comments/

   The WG's decision to request publication as a Candidate
   Recommendation @@ MAY BE taken during a teleconference on 25 April
   2007 whose minutes may be found at
   http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/ @@@ TODO

Summary of Comments

   All last Call comments have been considered, and a notification of
   the fact sent to every commenter. There is a Disposition of Comments
   outlining the status of all current comments at:
   [8]http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/grddl-wg/lc-spec.html. We are either
   waiting for a response from a commenter, or are ongoing engaged with
   the commenter.

      [8] http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/grddl-wg/lc-spec.html

   Although we have no normative dependencies on these groups and
   require no formal comments, we requrest comments from all groups
   mentioned in our charter., we have received from the XML Schema WG
   [9]explicit approval and [10]recognition, although no formal
   comments, from [11]DIWG Working Group. Although we do not require
   formal comments from them, we notified both the [12]TAG and the
   [13]Semantic Web Deployment WG when we went to Last Call, and have
   yet to receive any comments from them. The document being sent to CR
   contains the changes that were made to accommodate comments made
   during the Last Call status..

      [9] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-grddl-comments/2007JanMar/0080.html
     [10] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-di/2007Feb/0001.html
     [11] http://www.w3.org/2001/di/
     [12] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-archive/2007Feb/0015.html
     [13] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-archive/2007Feb/0006.html

Schedule

   We propose a publication date of May 1st 2007.

   We propose that the CR period lasts from the date of publication
   until 1 June 2007. Given the brevity of the specification, the
   length of time the specification has been around previous to the
   creation of the WG, and the current active development of several
   implementations, we expect to collect the necessary implementation
   experience in that time.

Preliminary Implementation Report

   There is a preliminary Implementation Report at
   [14]http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/grddl-wg/td/test_results. Note that
   this implementation report shows three implementations in three
   different languages undergoing active development: GRDDL.py
   (Python), Jena (Java), and Raptor (C).

     [14] http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/grddl-wg/td/test_results

Proposed CR Abstract, Title, and Status Section

  Title

   Gleaning Resource Descriptions from Dialects of Languages (GRDDL)

  Abstract

   GRDDL is a mechanism for Gleaning Resource Descriptions from
   Dialects of Languages. This GRDDL specification introduces markup
   based on existing standards for declaring that an XML document
   includes data compatible with the Resource Description Framework
   (RDF) and for linking to algorithms (typically represented in XSLT),
   for extracting this data from the document.

   The markup includes a namespace-qualified attribute for use in
   general-purpose XML documents and a profile-qualified link
   relationship for use in valid XHTML documents. The GRDDL mechanism
   also allows an XML namespace document (or XHTML profile document) to
   declare that every document associated with that namespace (or
   profile) includes gleanable data and for linking to an algorithm for
   gleaning the data.

   A corresponding [15]GRDDL Use Case Working Draft provides motivating
   examples. A [16]GRDDL Primer demonstrates the mechanism on XHTML
   documents which include widely-deployed dialects known as
   microformats.

     [15] http://www.w3.org/TR/grddl-scenarios
     [16] http://www.w3.org/TR/grddl-primer

  Status

     This section describes the status of this document at the time of
     its publication[PUBFIX which hasn't happened yet]. Other documents
     may supersede this document. A list of current W3C publications
     and the latest revision of this technical report can be found in
     the W3C technical reports index at [17]http://www.w3.org/TR

     [17] http://www.w3.org/TR/

     This May 2007 @@TODO CHECK release of the GRDDL Specificationis a
     [18]Candidate Recommendation; it been widely reviewed and
     satisfies the requirements documented in [19]GRDDL Charter; W3C
     publishes a Candidate Recommendation to gather implementation
     experience. A [20]log of changes is maintained for the convenience
     of editors and reviewers.

     [18] http://www.w3.org/2003/06/Process-20030618/tr.html#RecsCR
     [19] http://www.w3.org/2006/07/grddl-charter.html
     [20] http://www.w3.org/TR/grddl/#changes

     The first release of this document was 24 Oct 2006 @@TODO: DOES
     THIS COUNT THE MEMBER SUBMISSION? and the [21]GRDDL Working Group
     has made its best effort to address [22]comments received since
     then, and has also resolved all outstanding issues [23]list of
     issues meanwhile.There are no normative dependencies to this
     document that would prevent it from being advanced to Proposed
     Recommendation status. The design has stabilized and the Working
     Group intends to advance this specification to Proposed
     Recommendation once the exit criteria below are met:
     * There are at least two interoperable implementations of the
       specification. This will be determined by conformance to the
       [24]GRDDL Test Cases. The GRDDL WG will send both [25]GRDDL Test
       Cases and [26]Gleaning Resource Descriptions from Dialects of
       Languages (GRDDL) to PR at the same time, and all other
       ancillary documentation required by the charter will be
       published by then in final form as well.
     * A minimum of four weeks of the CR period must have elapsed.

     [21] http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/grddl-wg/
     [22] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-grddl-comments/
     [23] http://www.w3.org/TR/grddl/#issues
     [24] http://www.w3.org/TR/grddl-tests/
     [25] http://www.w3.org/TR/grddl-tests
     [26] http://www.w3.org/TR/grddl/

     This specification will remain a Candidate Recommendation until at
     least 30 May 2007.

     Comments on this document should be sent to
     [27]public-grddl-comments@w3.org, a mailing list with a [28]public
     archive.

     [27] mailto:public-grddl-comments@w3.org
     [28] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-grddl-comments

     Publication as a Candidate Recommendation does not imply
     endorsement by the W3C Membership. This is a draft document and
     may be updated, replaced or obsoleted by other documents at any
     time. It is inappropriate to cite this document as other than work
     in progress.

     This document was produced by a group operating under the [29]5
     February 2004 W3C Patent Policy. W3C maintains a [30]public list
     of any patent disclosures made in connection with the deliverables
     of the group; that page also includes instructions for disclosing
     a patent. An individual who has actual knowledge of a patent which
     the individual believes contains [31]Essential Claim(s) must
     disclose the information in accordance with [32]section 6 of the
     W3C Patent Policy.

     [29] http://www.w3.org/Consortium/Patent-Policy-20040205/
     [30] http://www.w3.org/2004/01/pp-impl/35463/status
     [31] http://www.w3.org/Consortium/Patent-Policy-20040205/#def-essential
     [32] http://www.w3.org/Consortium/Patent-Policy-20040205/#sec-Disclosure

Implementation Experience: Test Cases, Software, and Services

   A draft [33]GRDDL Test Cases are available, upon which an in
   progress [34]implementation report is based.

     [33] http://www.w3.org/TR/grddl-tests/
     [34] http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/grddl-wg/td/test_results

   W3C provides pair of online services on an experimental, best-effort
   basis:
     * [35]one demo for XHTML and
     * [36]one demo for generic XML

     [35] http://www.w3.org/2003/11/rdf-in-xhtml-demo
     [36] http://www.w3.org/2004/01/rdxh/grddl-xml-demo

   The [37]GrddlImplementations topic in the ESW Wiki is a
   community-maintained lists of GRDDL implementations in C, Java,
   Python, PHP and perhaps other languages.

     [37] http://esw.w3.org/topic/GrddlImplementations

Exit Criteria

   The GRDDL Working Group will advance the specification to Proposed
   Recommendation when the following exit criteria have been met:
     * There are at least two interoperable implementations of the
       specification. This will be determined by conformance to the
       [38]GRDDL Test Cases. The GRDDL WG will send both [39]GRDDL Test
       Cases and [40]Gleaning Resource Descriptions from Dialects of
       Languages (GRDDL) to PR at the same time, and all other
       ancillary documentation required by the charter will be
       published by then in final form as well.
     * A minimum of four weeks of the CR period must have elapsed.

     [38] http://www.w3.org/TR/grddl-tests/
     [39] http://www.w3.org/TR/grddl-tests/
     [40] http://www.w3.org/TR/grddl-tests

   Any feedback on implementation and use of this specification would
   be very welcome. To the extent possible, please provide a separate
   email message for each distinct comment.

   A preliminary Implementation Report is available at:
   [41]http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/grddl-wg/td/test_results

     [41] http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/grddl-wg/td/test_results

   Note that also the GRDDL WG has produced a [42]Test Cases, a
   [43]Use-Case Scenario, and [44]Standard Library of Transforms, and a
   [45]GRDDL Primer. However, all of these documents currently exist as
   Working Drafts or Notes, and we believe by the time that Gleaning
   Resource Descriptions from Dialects of Languages (GRDDL) reaches
   Proposed Recommendation status, all of these documents will be
   complete and our charter will be fulfilled.

     [42] http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/grddl-wg/
     [43] http://www.w3.org/TR/grddl-scenarios/
     [44] http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/grddl-wg/library
     [45] http://www.w3.org/TR/grddl-primer/



-- 
		-harry

Harry Halpin,  University of Edinburgh 
http://www.ibiblio.org/hhalpin 6B522426
Received on Wednesday, 25 April 2007 00:58:29 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:11:49 GMT