W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-grddl-wg@w3.org > April 2007

Re: intention to propose LC/CR

From: Harry Halpin <hhalpin@ibiblio.org>
Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2007 14:19:48 -0400
Message-ID: <462E4A44.9000506@ibiblio.org>
To: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hpl.hp.com>
Cc: GRDDL Working Group <public-grddl-wg@w3.org>

I'm happy to see LC of TC, and I trust everyone working on it enough
that I am willing to attempt consensus on LC at our telecon tomorrow -
the agenda will be out shortly.

I have updated the Primer (although it needs lots of link fixing and
example checking, which I will try to get to today). I'll be neutral on
it  - the TC are clearly more important.

I will also get a CR transition draft out for GRDDL Spec and e-mail to list.

Thanks for all the hard work!

Jeremy Carroll wrote:
> Hi Harry
> I am expecting to be able to formally propose moving the test cases to
> LC and the spec to CR, but not before the agenda deadline.
> The proposals will have the form
> Propose publishing LC of TC subject to:
> - a
> - b
> - c
> But I haven't worked out a, b and c yet.
> Note that while these two are related, it is possible to publish LC of
> Test Cases, without moving the spec to CR (which is procedurally more
> difficult). Hence it may be most effective to decide on the test cases
> prior to deciding on the spec. Hmmm... I guess I would structure the
> agenda:
> - issues against spec
> - test approvals
> - test cases for LC
> - other issues considering CR
>   + lc comments
>   + other process issues
> - spec for CR
> also depends on the current state of the primer.
> Personally, I am currently inclined to oppose LC on the primer, should
> anyone care to propose it.
> Jeremy


Harry Halpin,  University of Edinburgh 
http://www.ibiblio.org/hhalpin 6B522426
Received on Tuesday, 24 April 2007 18:19:55 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:39:11 UTC