On Mon, 2007-04-23 at 17:50 +0100, Jeremy Carroll wrote: > > The test document is intended for LC. > I think missing small amounts of informative text would be acceptable. > > I also think that we can publish a LC test cases, in which many of the > tests have not been approved. I may try drafting some Status of This > Document text that explains that. Good luck; LC is explicitly "there are no open issues that we know of" and an unapproved test sure smells a lot like an open issue that we know of. > As is, it would be good if we can manage to approve more tests this week > before publication. I'm OK with removing any tests we don't manage to approve. I mean them from the test cases document/manifest/zip only; we can keep the input/output documents lying around in the web. -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/ D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541 0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29EReceived on Monday, 23 April 2007 17:53:01 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:11:49 GMT