W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-grddl-wg@w3.org > April 2007

Re: Updated Editor's Draft of Test Document

From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2007 12:52:59 -0500
To: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hpl.hp.com>
Cc: ogbujic@ccf.org, GRDDL Working Group <public-grddl-wg@w3.org>
Message-Id: <1177350779.9528.60.camel@dirk>

On Mon, 2007-04-23 at 17:50 +0100, Jeremy Carroll wrote:
> The test document is intended for LC.
> I think missing small amounts of informative text would be acceptable.
> I also think that we can publish a LC test cases, in which many of the 
> tests have not been approved. I may try drafting some Status of This 
> Document text that explains that.

Good luck; LC is explicitly "there are no open issues that we know of"
and an unapproved test sure smells a lot like an open issue that
we know of.

> As is, it would be good if we can manage to approve more tests this week 
> before publication.

I'm OK with removing any tests we don't manage to approve.

I mean them from the test cases document/manifest/zip only; we can keep
the input/output documents lying around in the web.

Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541  0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E
Received on Monday, 23 April 2007 17:53:01 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:39:11 UTC