W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-grddl-wg@w3.org > April 2007

Re: Invalid XHTML Re: Another test suggesting change in the spec

From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2007 10:48:14 -0500
To: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hpl.hp.com>
Cc: GRDDL Working Group <public-grddl-wg@w3.org>
Message-Id: <1177343295.9528.36.camel@dirk>

On Mon, 2007-04-23 at 14:13 +0100, Jeremy Carroll wrote:
> 
> A modification to my previous suggested text
> 
> [[
> While these mechanisms are intended primarily
> for valid XHTML family documents, they also
> may be used with invalid XHTML family documents,
> particularly those that would be valid
> upon deletion of all namespace qualified attributes.
> ]]

What do you mean by "invalid XHTML family documents"?
There is no such thing, as far as I know. All the
current XHTML specs use DTDs to say what an XHTML document
is, I think.


> 
> Jeremy
> 
> Jeremy Carroll wrote:
> > I suggest, at the end of section 4,
> > http://www.w3.org/TR/2007/WD-grddl-20070302/#grddl-xhtml
> >  immediately before the section 5 heading, the following informative 
> > paragraph, clarifying the scope of the previous two normative statements.

-- 
Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541  0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E
Received on Monday, 23 April 2007 15:48:17 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:11:49 GMT