W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-grddl-wg@w3.org > April 2007

Re: hGRRDL for hCard: test case of a GRDDL transformation to produce RDFa from hCards

From: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hpl.hp.com>
Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2007 14:54:31 +0100
Message-ID: <46277497.9000805@hpl.hp.com>
To: Ben Adida <ben@adida.net>
CC: Fabien Gandon <Fabien.Gandon@sophia.inria.fr>, Shane McCarron <shane@aptest.com>, GRDDL Working Group <public-grddl-wg@w3.org>, public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org

 From a GRDDL perspective, there is an expectation of handling invalid 
XHTML (like other user-agents)

I tend to agree with Ben


Ben Adida wrote:
> Fabien Gandon wrote:
>> Well I could need some help here because I can imagine that what needs
>> to be added is something like:
>> <!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN"
>>  "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"
>> [
>>  <!ATTLIST html
>>      xmlns:v CDATA #FIXED "http://www.w3.org/2006/vcard/ns#"
>>      xmlns:rdf CDATA #FIXED "http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
>>      xmlns:h CDATA #FIXED "http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"
>>      xmlns CDATA #FIXED "http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"
>>  >
>> ]
> I would rather we *not* do this. From our last RDFa telecon, we agreed
> that this was a screwup with how the W3C validator works, in that it
> doesn't do XML DTDs. Let's not hack around a bug with something that
> will scare people away from RDFa needlessly.
> -Ben

Hewlett-Packard Limited
registered Office: Cain Road, Bracknell, Berks RG12 1HN
Registered No: 690597 England
Received on Thursday, 19 April 2007 13:54:49 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:39:11 UTC