- From: Clark, John <CLARKJ2@ccf.org>
- Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2007 14:27:24 -0400
- To: "GRDDL Working Group" <public-grddl-wg@w3.org>
> It is worth noting that RFC 2396 gives us guidance on the 30X
> scenario and in particular supports (for instance) Jeremey's
> interpretation of relative URI references in
> http://purl.org/NET/erdf/ as requiring a resolution against
> http://research.talis.com/2005/erdf/
>
> 5.1.3. Base URI from the Retrieval URI:
> [[[
> Note that if the retrieval was the
> result of a redirected request, the last URI used (i.e., that
> which resulted in the actual retrieval of the document) is
> the base URI.
> ]]]
Nice spot on this. Just for completeness, this concept is carried
through into RFC 3986[0]. All told, I thought your email was a thorough
treatment of this "issue".
Take care,
John L. Clark
[0] http://gbiv.com/protocols/uri/rfc/rfc3986.html#base-retrieval
===================================
Cleveland Clinic is ranked one of the top 3 hospitals in
America by U.S.News & World Report. Visit us online at
http://www.clevelandclinic.org for a complete listing of
our services, staff and locations.
Confidentiality Note: This message is intended for use
only by the individual or entity to which it is addressed
and may contain information that is privileged,
confidential, and exempt from disclosure under applicable
law. If the reader of this message is not the intended
recipient or the employee or agent responsible for
delivering the message to the intended recipient, you are
hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or
copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If
you have received this communication in error, please
contact the sender immediately and destroy the material in
its entirety, whether electronic or hard copy. Thank you.
Received on Tuesday, 17 April 2007 18:39:35 UTC