- From: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hpl.hp.com>
- Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2007 11:50:53 +0100
- To: ogbujic@ccf.org
- CC: GRDDL Working Group <public-grddl-wg@w3.org>
Hmmm. Yes Chime is right here. XML Base explicitly requires licensing: http://www.w3.org/TR/2001/REC-xmlbase-20010627/#introduction [[ The deployment of XML Base is through normative reference by new specifications, for example XLink and the XML Infoset. Applications and specifications built upon these new technologies will natively support XML Base. The behavior of xml:base attributes in applications based on specifications that do not have direct or indirect normative reference to XML Base is undefined. ]] Since RDF/XML does use XML base, and some of the documents that may be input to GRDDL transforms may be defined in namespaces that use XML base, or some other mechanism ... I don't think that silence on this issue is appropriate. Also, the 3XX issue is base related, but in another part of the stack - and the example in the test is a HTML profile base problem. Thus, I think we should reopen the issue, sorry. I no longer think we can meet our schedule. Jeremy Chimezie Ogbuji wrote: >> I mostly think this is editorial, i.e. it doesn't merit re-opening >> issue-base-param. Harry, you might want to give that a think. > > I agree. > -- Hewlett-Packard Limited registered Office: Cain Road, Bracknell, Berks RG12 1HN Registered No: 690597 England
Received on Tuesday, 17 April 2007 10:51:16 UTC