PROPOSED: Approve previous minutes

RESOLUTION: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-grddl-wg/2006Sep/att-0077/Sep06-grddl-wg-minutes.htm is approved

iand: integrated various input into Primer

briansuda: possibly remove references to SPARQL?

FabienGandon: no problem with two SPARQL queries in primer. but generally concerned with references to SPARQL

ericP: is POX (Plain Old XML) a common acronym?

<FabienGandon> extract from use case is "the Atom Publishing Protocol's use of HTTP and POX (Plain Old XML) as the primary remote messaging mechanism "

ericP: better to say 'single-purpose XML vocabulary' than POX

<FabienGandon> +q to propose an RDFa section http://www-sop.inria.fr/acacia/personnel/Fabien.Gandon/tmp/grddl/rdfaprimer/PrimerRDFaSection.html

<scribe> ACTION: iand, Fabien to change wording of POX to 'single-purpose XML vocabulary' or something similar [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2006/09/13-grddl-wg-minutes.html#action01]

Harry: is okay with going with usecase document and primer now and spec later

<FabienGandon> pointer is http://www-sop.inria.fr/acacia/personnel/Fabien.Gandon/tmp/grddl/rdfaprimer/PrimerRDFaSection.html

Harry: is the output RDF syntax or embedded RDFa?

FabienGandon: RDFa is the input and RDF comes out

iand: concerned with length of primer

iand: concerned about RDFa not being finalized

<iand> e.g syntax like <link rel="rdf:type" href="[foaf:Person]" />

Harry: it's in our scope and need to at least mention it (perhaps not in primer)

iand: rework examples to avoide the moving target

Harry: table RDFa from primer at least

FabienGandon: agrees proposes to submit to rdf-in-xhtml

<FabienGandon> ACTION: Fabien to submit to the RDFa example to rdf-in-xhtml [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2006/09/13-grddl-wg-minutes.html#action02]

<scribe> ACTION: iand to remove references to RDFa from primer [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2006/09/13-grddl-wg-minutes.html#action03]

FabienGandon: not clear on technical solution to usecase 7

<FabienGandon> Use case 7: http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/grddl-wg/doc43/scenario-gallery.htm#use_case_7

ericP: 'lifting and lowering' - markup in XML schema to accomodate transformation between XML & RDF

RDAL: http://www.w3.org/2004/02/03-rdal/

chimezie: isn't this currently out of scope of the current GRDDL mechanism?

ericP: mandatory attribute

HarryH: good practice for RDDL-in-GRDDL but in distant future..
... shouldn't include usecase 7
... RDFa as output shouldn't be included w/out concensus

Fabien, could you put your ACTION item, I didn't get the details?

<FabienGandon> ACTION: Fabien to open two threads on the two issues "RDFa production" and "XML Schema technical production" [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2006/09/13-grddl-wg-minutes.html#action04]

<FabienGandon> ACTION: Ryager to review the Use Cases for next week [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2006/09/13-grddl-wg-minutes.html#action05]