See also: IRC log
PROPOSED: Approve previous minutes
RESOLUTION: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-grddl-wg/2006Sep/att-0077/Sep06-grddl-wg-minutes.htm is approved
iand: integrated various input into Primer
briansuda: possibly remove references to SPARQL?
FabienGandon: no problem with two SPARQL queries in primer. but generally concerned with references to SPARQL
ericP: is POX (Plain Old XML) a common acronym?
<FabienGandon> extract from use case is "the Atom Publishing Protocol's use of HTTP and POX (Plain Old XML) as the primary remote messaging mechanism "
ericP: better to say 'single-purpose XML vocabulary' than POX
<FabienGandon> +q to propose an RDFa section http://www-sop.inria.fr/acacia/personnel/Fabien.Gandon/tmp/grddl/rdfaprimer/PrimerRDFaSection.html
<scribe> ACTION: iand, Fabien to change wording of POX to 'single-purpose XML vocabulary' or something similar [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2006/09/13-grddl-wg-minutes.html#action01]
Harry: is okay with going with usecase document and primer now and spec later
<FabienGandon> pointer is http://www-sop.inria.fr/acacia/personnel/Fabien.Gandon/tmp/grddl/rdfaprimer/PrimerRDFaSection.html
Harry: is the output RDF syntax or embedded RDFa?
FabienGandon: RDFa is the input and RDF comes out
iand: concerned with length of primer
iand: concerned about RDFa not being finalized
<iand> e.g syntax like <link rel="rdf:type" href="[foaf:Person]" />
Harry: it's in our scope and need to at least mention it (perhaps not in primer)
iand: rework examples to avoide the moving target
Harry: table RDFa from primer at least
FabienGandon: agrees proposes to submit to rdf-in-xhtml
<FabienGandon> ACTION: Fabien to submit to the RDFa example to rdf-in-xhtml [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2006/09/13-grddl-wg-minutes.html#action02]
<scribe> ACTION: iand to remove references to RDFa from primer [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2006/09/13-grddl-wg-minutes.html#action03]
FabienGandon: not clear on technical solution to usecase 7
<FabienGandon> Use case 7: http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/grddl-wg/doc43/scenario-gallery.htm#use_case_7
ericP: 'lifting and lowering' - markup in XML schema to accomodate transformation between XML & RDF
chimezie: isn't this currently out of scope of the current GRDDL mechanism?
ericP: mandatory attribute
HarryH: good practice for
RDDL-in-GRDDL but in distant future..
... shouldn't include usecase 7
... RDFa as output shouldn't be included w/out concensus
Fabien, could you put your ACTION item, I didn't get the details?
<FabienGandon> ACTION: Fabien to open two threads on the two issues "RDFa production" and "XML Schema technical production" [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2006/09/13-grddl-wg-minutes.html#action04]
<FabienGandon> ACTION: Ryager to review the Use Cases for next week [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2006/09/13-grddl-wg-minutes.html#action05]