Re: GRDDL links in HTTP? (new issue?)

On 11/09/2006 17:58, Dan Connolly wrote:
> I'm moderately inclined to add support for this in my code,
> and thereby work out the details.
> Maybe it should end up in the GRDDL standard, maybe it shouldn't.
> If somebody else thinks it's important for the WG to decide one
> way or another, please say so, and I'll add it to the WG issues list.
> 
I think a header indicating the location of a transform would be a 
valuable addition. Perhaps this could be a useful mechanism:

http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-nottingham-http-link-header-00.txt

Ian