W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-grddl-wg@w3.org > October 2006

Re: hope to hear from you today about the GRDDL spec

From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
Date: Fri, 20 Oct 2006 14:03:05 -0500
To: Ben Adida <ben@adida.net>
Cc: GRDDL Working Group <public-grddl-wg@w3.org>
Message-Id: <1161370985.4237.271.camel@dirk>

On Fri, 2006-10-20 at 14:38 -0400, Ben Adida wrote:
> Dan Connolly wrote:
> > I think you missed a subtlety.
> > Any GRDDL result of ?NSDOC is a result of ?D by the 1st bullet.
> So this means that you can declare a namespaceTransformation in the
> instance document? I guess that doesn't hurt, but it's fairly confusing.
> I'm not sure what the value of this generalized formalization is.

I think there's a reason, but I'm not sure I remember it.
I was in quite a fugue when I came up with this formulation,
and I'm not sure I can return to that state this week.
I hope I can explain it in due course.

Meanwhile, as you say, the current draft specification
doesn't hurt.

Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541  0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E
Received on Friday, 20 October 2006 19:03:16 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:39:09 UTC