W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-grddl-wg@w3.org > October 2006

Re: spec#issue-output-formats formal specification in terms of graphs

From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
Date: Fri, 20 Oct 2006 08:35:26 -0500
To: Chimezie Ogbuji <ogbujic@bio.ri.ccf.org>
Cc: GRDDL Working Group <public-grddl-wg@w3.org>
Message-Id: <1161351326.4237.152.camel@dirk>

On Thu, 2006-10-19 at 22:51 -0400, Chimezie Ogbuji wrote:
> I've had a chance to ponder this issue.  In the end I think the 
> language is fine as it is.

Ah. Good. At least for now.

Can I take this as your thumbs-up of the document overall? i.e.
you're out of the critical path for publication in the sense
of the decision we made?

"PROPOSED: to publish 24 Oct http://www.w3.org/2004/01/rdxh/spec 1.120 +
edits by DanC, contingent on editor (DanC) satisfying comments to come
from BenA, Chime, Rachael
...
so RESOLVED."
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-grddl-wg/2006Oct/att-0052/18-grddl-wg-minutes.html#item04


>   In particular,
[... lots of interesting details which I hope to return to once
I get this spec released...]

-- 
Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541  0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E
Received on Friday, 20 October 2006 13:35:37 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:11:46 GMT