W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-grddl-wg@w3.org > October 2006

PI Blurb..

From: Chimezie Ogbuji <ogbujic@bio.ri.ccf.org>
Date: Tue, 17 Oct 2006 21:17:34 -0400 (EDT)
To: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
cc: GRDDL Working Group <public-grddl-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.4.60.0610172043550.9661@joplin.bio.ri.ccf.org>

The tone of "Associating Style Sheets with XML documents Version 1.0" 
suggests a segue like this - right before the 'Faithful Rendition 
Guarantee', since the end of that section speaks of other 'related' specifications 
(XProc being one of them):

"The mechanisms by which GRDDL links transformation algorithms to source 
documents for automated processing can be considered as a more 
appropriate recommendation than xml-stylesheet Processing Instructions.

Though deprecated, xml-stylesheet PIs are widely supported by 
major browser vendors and generally deployed for automated, presentation processing.

Although GRDDL is primarily concerned with dialect interpretation, the 
expectation that a user agent would trigger XML transformations against a 
source document automatically is the same in both GRDDL and xml-stylesheet 
PIs."

Perhaps as a section by itself? - 6a Prior stylesheet associations / Deprecated stylesheet associations


Chimezie Ogbuji
Lead Systems Analyst
Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery
Cleveland Clinic Foundation
9500 Euclid Avenue/ W26
Cleveland, Ohio 44195
Office: (216)444-8593
ogbujic@ccf.org

On Tue, 17 Oct 2006, Dan Connolly wrote:

>
> On Tue, 2006-10-17 at 13:17 -0400, Chimezie Ogbuji wrote:
>> On Tue, 17 Oct 2006, Murray Maloney wrote:
> [...]
>> "So why not <?xml-stylesheet ?> and how are GRDDL transforms different from transforms identified this way".
>>
>> I don't think a paragraph explaining the following points is too much to
>> ask to explain the need for a significant departure from the ?xml-stylesheet precedent:
>
> The TODO has been there for a while and neither I nor anybody else has
> come up with any suggested text. Murray suggested taking it out,
> and that works for me, so I did. If you suggest something in its
> place, I'll happily consider it.
>
> --
> Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
> D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541  0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E
>
>
Received on Wednesday, 18 October 2006 01:17:44 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:11:46 GMT