W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-grddl-wg@w3.org > October 2006

Re: section 2. Adding GRDDL to well-formed XML for review

From: Chimezie Ogbuji <ogbujic@bio.ri.ccf.org>
Date: Tue, 17 Oct 2006 13:36:14 -0400 (EDT)
To: GRDDL Working Group <public-grddl-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.4.60.0610171335460.8890@joplin.bio.ri.ccf.org>


On Tue, 17 Oct 2006, Dan Connolly wrote:
> On Tue, 2006-10-17 at 13:17 -0400, Chimezie Ogbuji wrote:
>> On Tue, 17 Oct 2006, Murray Maloney wrote:
> [...]
>> "So why not <?xml-stylesheet ?> and how are GRDDL transforms different from transforms identified this way".
>>
>> I don't think a paragraph explaining the following points is too much to
>> ask to explain the need for a significant departure from the ?xml-stylesheet precedent:
>
> The TODO has been there for a while and neither I nor anybody else has
> come up with any suggested text. Murray suggested taking it out,
> and that works for me, so I did. If you suggest something in its
> place, I'll happily consider it.

Fair enough, I'll work up a suggestion.

Chimezie Ogbuji
Lead Systems Analyst
Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery
Cleveland Clinic Foundation
9500 Euclid Avenue/ W26
Cleveland, Ohio 44195
Office: (216)444-8593
ogbujic@ccf.org
Received on Tuesday, 17 October 2006 17:36:27 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:11:46 GMT