W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-grddl-wg@w3.org > October 2006

Re: section 2. Adding GRDDL to well-formed XML for review

From: Murray Maloney <murray@muzmo.com>
Date: Tue, 17 Oct 2006 12:43:23 -0400
Message-Id: <5.1.1.6.2.20061017124138.02cef778@mail.muzmo.com>
To: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
Cc: GRDDL Working Group <public-grddl-wg@w3.org>
Dan,

The definitions should probably be in reverse order.
Just in terms of the importance of each defnition.

At 11:18 AM 10/17/2006 -0500, Dan Connolly wrote:

>Section 2 is now called "Adding GRDDL to well-formed XML".
>
>http://www.w3.org/2004/01/rdxh/spec#grddl-xml
>Revision 1.106  2006/10/17 16:06:56
>
>I ended up defining "GRDDL result" formally and using
>"source document".
>
>Also, regarding...
>
>  TODO: explain why not <?xml-stylesheet ?>
>
>Murray says: No explanation is needed. This is a design decision
>that is in keeping with Web Architecture. PIs are deprecated.
>
>That works for me, so I took the TODO out.
>
>--
>Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
>D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541  0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E
Received on Tuesday, 17 October 2006 16:43:34 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:11:46 GMT