W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-grddl-wg@w3.org > October 2006

Re: [#issue-mt-ns] GRDDL and Processing Order

From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
Date: Wed, 11 Oct 2006 09:59:05 -0500
To: Harry Halpin <hhalpin@ibiblio.org>
Cc: Murray Maloney <murray@muzmo.com>, public-grddl-wg <public-grddl-wg@w3.org>
Message-Id: <1160578745.4606.237.camel@dirk>

On Mon, 2006-10-09 at 21:16 +0100, Harry Halpin wrote:
> Apologies for my moment of incoherence. Let me rephrase the issue I'm
> trying to get at

I'm not inclined to make any of the suggested spec changes at
this point.

I think it's critical that we develop test cases for the
cases noted in the issue...


http://www.w3.org/2004/01/rdxh/spec#issue-mt-ns

      * how a GRDDL client interacts with a document whose root element
        is an XSLT literal result element
      * how a GRDDL client interacts with an RDF document that has a
        root element other than rdf:RDF.
      * whether RDF/XML statements labelled as application/xml
        constitute a "document whose meaning includes the RDF
        statement ..."
      * what happens if data-view:transformation is given on an rdf:RDF
        root element

In the course of working out the details of those test cases,
it will either become clear that the spec should change or that
it should stay as is.

-- 
Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541  0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E
Received on Wednesday, 11 October 2006 14:59:12 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:11:46 GMT