Re: GRDDL Spec Review

On Thu, 2006-11-16 at 10:42 +0100, Fabien Gandon wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> First, I want to apologize for not being very reactive these days.

Availability and energy rises and falls; it's understandable.

> Below is a review of the current Spec document that I finally managed to 
> read linearly in the plane.

Exactly which spec document? URI and date (if not version number)?
Some of your comments suggest you're reviewing something older
than the current editor's draft.
  http://www.w3.org/2004/01/rdxh/spec
  1.160 2006/11/10 08:21:12


> *TEI example:* The closing tag <title> is missing an "e".

OK, that's fixed in 1.161 2006/11/16 14:17:13 .

As to the others, I await clarification about which spec
your review applies to.

-- 
Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541  0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E