W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-grddl-wg@w3.org > November 2006

Re: Rules bug?

From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
Date: Wed, 15 Nov 2006 11:16:52 -0600
To: "McBride, Brian" <brian.mcbride@hp.com>
Cc: public-grddl-wg@w3.org
Message-Id: <1163611012.28647.197.camel@dirk>

On Wed, 2006-11-15 at 15:34 +0000, McBride, Brian wrote:
> What happens if an information resource has more than one XML
> representation?
> 
> 
> In http://www.w3.org/2004/01/rdxh/spec revision 1.160
> 
> It states:
> 
> S1
> [[
> If an information resource IR is represented by an XML document whose
> root node is linked to a GRDDL transformation TX, then TX is a GRDDL
> transformation of IR.
> ]]
> 
> And S2
> 
> [[
> If an information resource IR has a GRDDL transformation whose
> transformation property TP, applied to the XML root node from a
> representation of IR, gives an RDF Graph G, then G is a GRDDL result of
> IR.
> ]]
> 
> Consider IR1 which has two XML represenations XML-svg and XML-xhtml.
> 
> The root node of XML-svg is linked to the GRDDL transformat t-svg and so
> t-svg is a GRDDL transformation of IR. (S1)
> 
> The root node of XML-xhtml is linked to the GRDDL transformation t-xhtml
> and so t-xhtml is a GRDDL transformation of IR.  (S1)
> 
> If t-xhtml applied to the root node of XML-svg produces and RDF graph
> G-svg-xhtml, then G-svg-xhtml is a GRDDL result of IR1. (S2)

Correct. Both are GRDDL results of IR1.

> I think this is an error.  Transformations have to be linked to
> representations not information resources

I disagree.

I think this is an excellent test case sketch. I hope to flesh
it out presently; bonus points to anybody who beats me to it.

> 
> Brian
> 
-- 
Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541  0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E
Received on Wednesday, 15 November 2006 17:17:08 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:11:46 GMT