Re: fixed GRDDL formal rules...

At 12:38 PM 11/7/2006 -0600, Dan Connolly wrote:

>If rev 1.155 of section 2 is clear, I can try something like that in 
>section 3.

I am able to follow the normative parts of Section 2, with or without the 
examples.

Received on Tuesday, 7 November 2006 18:54:44 UTC