W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-grddl-wg@w3.org > November 2006

Re: toward tests for spec#issue-mt-ns (OWL media types)

From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
Date: Wed, 01 Nov 2006 12:35:32 -0600
To: GRDDL Working Group <public-grddl-wg@w3.org>
Message-Id: <1162406133.8627.243.camel@dirk>

On Wed, 2006-11-01 at 11:56 -0600, Dan Connolly wrote:
[...]
> As another data point, ...

In today's telcon, I quoted...

[[
The Internet media type / MIME type for RDF/XML is "application/rdf+xml"
]]
 -- http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-syntax-grammar/


It's also relevant to consider the OWL precedent...

[[
The Web Ontology Working Group has not requested a separate MIME type
for OWL documents. Instead, we recommend to use the MIME type requested
by the RDF Core Working Group, namely application/rdf+xml [RDF
Concepts], or alternatively the XML MIME type application/xml.

As file extension, we recommend to use either .rdf or .owl. 
]]
 -- http://www.w3.org/TR/owl-ref/


That results from one of my more thorough explanations
of XML media types and namespaces...
on media types for OWL (5.13)
Date: 23 Oct 2002 15:57:53 -0500
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-webont-wg/2002Oct/0162.html


... which is cited from http://esw.w3.org/topic/FollowYourNose


Sorry for all the little teeny messages on this issue,
but more stuff keeps occurring to me...

-- 
Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541  0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E
Received on Wednesday, 1 November 2006 18:36:18 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:11:46 GMT